↓ Download PDF
Team Empathy  ·  Search & AI Strategy

Be the backyard-building group
AI recommends in Australia.

Prepared for Tiffany Lin · Fort Group: SheShedz · Trekk Spaces · Aura Cabins

Getting your brands found on ChatGPT

Australia   |   28 August 2026  ·  Team Empathy

1. Executive summary

The short version. Your own HubSpot says organic search is the biggest revenue engine Fort Group has: A$1.25M of SheShed pipeline created and A$268,968 closed won traced to organic Google search first touch in the last 90 days alone, more than paid Google on the same deal count. Nearly all of that search demand is non-branded: people searching "pool house", "garden office" and "granny flat kits", not your name, which means it can grow. SheShedz appears across eleven demand lanes but wins positions 4 to 20 rather than the top three, Trekk sits on page two of every timber shed term within weeks of its relaunch, and Aura is not yet measured at all. This is a finish-the-job build on an engine that is already paying for itself.
Three things to know
The non-branded market, and the share of it you hold

The model below runs on SheShedz, the brand with the funnel history to measure; Trekk and Aura are sized separately in section 4.

740,160
measured non-branded searches a year across SheShedz's lanes in Australia
148,032
of those are organic clicks someone will win, once ads and AI answers take their share
41,219
is what you win today, which is 27.8% of the non-branded pool
$18,593
a year for every extra 1% of the pool you take, because 1% is 1,480 clicks

So the whole opportunity is one sentence: SheShedz holds 27.8% of the non-branded organic clicks in its category, and every extra 1% is worth about A$18,593 a year in closed deals. You already hold the joint-highest Domain Rating in the category and more than a quarter of its winnable clicks; the play is pushing a strong share towards a dominant one while the category's authority bar is still low.

What that is worth

Built on your own numbers: each organic click is worth a measured A$12.56 in closed-won revenue to SheShed (your HubSpot closed-won divided by the search clicks that produced it puts it at $13.25, and the same revenue over GA4 organic sessions puts it at $11.86; the model takes the midpoint). The full derivation is in section 4. Every column below is non-branded, closed-won revenue at that click value, and your 70-day sales cycle means clicks won today land as revenue about a quarter later. Modelled on measured inputs

CaseShare of the non-branded marketNon-branded clicks / yrNon-branded revenue / yrNew revenue / yr
Today27.8%41,219 (3,435 / mo)$517,711
Conservative33.0%48,851 (4,071 / mo)$613,569+$95,858
Mid42.0%62,173 (5,181 / mo)$780,893+$263,182
High52.0%76,977 (6,415 / mo)$966,831+$449,120

All figures AUD, ex GST, matching your HubSpot reporting. Trekk's own smaller model (section 4) adds +$8,598 a year at its mid case, taking the combined group mid case to +$271,780 a year, and Aura is deliberately not modelled until its tracking exists. Your branded traffic and your walk-in, phone and referral revenue sit on top of everything here, unchanged.

Where you focus, at a glance
SheShedz
~61,700 searches / mo across its lanes
The engine
Eleven demand lanes, page one on most, top three on almost none. The biggest measured funnel and the model above. Winning the top three here is most of the money.
Trekk Spaces
~3,500 searches / mo, timber sheds
The riser
Nine weeks post-relaunch and already page two on every money term. The cheapest striking-distance wins in the group, plus the Bunnings and Mitre 10 story nobody has told search engines yet.
Aura Cabins
~900 searches / mo, retreats and off-grid
Tracking first
A brochure site with zero conversion tracking, in the highest-ticket category of the three. Until measurement exists, every marketing dollar here is flying blind.

Triangulated AU search volume per brand's lanes, August 2026. The full keyword, prompt and cluster research behind every number here lives in The data tab. GKP + SEMrush

2. How AI-ready you are today: the AEO scorecard

We score every brand out of 100 against our AEO Maturity Model: four pillars (Technical, Content, Authority, Measurement), each out of 25. Certified is 80 out of 100, Professional on all four, the standard we build brands to. Each brand gets its own card, because they are in genuinely different places.

SheShedz50/100
Developing · real content and schema bones, held back by speed and measurement
Technical15/25
Content15/25
Authority10/25
Measurement10/25
Trekk Spaces30/100
Emerging · young site, broken analytics, real early rankings
Technical10/25
Content10/25
Authority5/25
Measurement5/25
Aura Cabins25/100
Emerging · clean, fast brochure with no content, authority or tracking
Technical10/25
Content5/25
Authority5/25
Measurement5/25
+30
points to Certified for SheShedz, the engine. Its content library and schema carry it; the climb is page speed, authority, and making the measurement you already have in HubSpot visible to the search side.
Where each brand is  ·  where it needs to be
SheShedz
50 / 100
Trekk
30 / 100
Aura
25 / 100
Today Where you need to be · Certified, 80 / 100

The detailed findings, how the scoring works, and where every number comes from are in the appendix.

3. The market you are missing: search and AI

A backyard building is a researched, high-ticket, 70-day decision. Your buyers ask the same questions in two places now, a search box and an AI chat, and the group that answers them wins both. Across the 125 terms we measured, folded to 91 head-term groups, the demand across all three brands' lanes is 66,120 searches a month in Australia, and SheShedz already appears on most of it.

Validated demand, and where you rank today
TermSearches / mo (AU)Your rank nowTerritory
garden shed22,60021.3Garden sheds
log cabin4,5008.4Cabins
shed kits4,40021.2Garden sheds
kit homes australia3,000Page 5+Granny flats & tiny homes
she shed2,7508.2She shed
office pod2,000Not rankingStudios & offices
pool house1,6006.1Pool houses & cabanas
prefab granny flat1,6006.5Granny flats & tiny homes
granny flat prices1,450Page 5+Granny flats & tiny homes
potting shed1,3006.9Garden sheds
pool cabana1,1507.4Pool houses & cabanas
timber garden sheds1,09012.9 (Trekk)Timber sheds
backyard studio1,00017.9Studios & offices
hairdressing sheds5208.4Business in a shed

Search volume triangulated across Google Keyword Planner and SEMrush (median), Australia, August 2026; Ahrefs joins as the third source within the week and any working volume that moves is updated in The data tab, along with live AI-answer flags per term. Your rank is the brand's current average Google position from its own Search Console (SheShedz unless marked Trekk). The pattern is one story everywhere: on page one or two, and not in the top three, and at these volumes the difference between position 8 and position 2 is the whole opportunity. GKP + SEMrush GSC

On the AI side we built a library of 82 real questions people ask AI engines about your categories, each anchored to measured search demand, your own Search Console queries, your own published FAQ content, and the questions behind the head terms. 79 of the 82 are questions the group can uniquely own, across all three brands. The full library, with per-question demand estimates, is in the appendix and The data tab.

The first-mover window. This category has no authority leader. SheShedz's Domain Rating of 19 is already the joint highest among the brands competing for these answers (Aarons Outdoor 19, Backyard Pods 12, YZY Kit Homes 12, Melwood 6). In most categories we audit, the incumbents hold DR 40 to 70 and the climb is steep; here, the first brand to build genuine authority and publish the answers AI engines cite takes the category. You are already ranking on regulatory questions like "what is a habitable room", 10,198 impressions worth, without ever having tried.

4. The opportunity, in dollars

The table in the executive summary is built from four numbers, all of them yours, and all of them non-branded. Here is the chain in full, for SheShedz first.

The searchesnon-branded, AU, / yr
740,160
The winnable clicksafter ads and AI answers
148,032
What you win today27.8% of the pool
41,219

Roughly one search in five survives ads, map packs and AI answers as a winnable organic click, and SheShedz already takes better than one in four of those. The pool is measured from the 91-term core only; the long tail beyond it is real, your own account proves it with 24,621 distinct non-branded queries and around 42,700 anonymised clicks over the same twelve months, and it is deliberately left out of the model. Modelled

Each organic click is worth A$12.56 in closed-won revenue to SheShed. The figure is funnel-measured two ways from your own systems: your HubSpot's A$268,968 of organic-Google closed-won revenue in the rolling 90 days divided by the 20,299 search clicks that produced it gives $13.25, and the same revenue over your 22,671 GA4 organic sessions gives $11.86. The two agree within 12%, and the model multiplies every case by their midpoint.

That is the whole model: win more of the 148,032 clicks.

The compounding curve (the mid case, arriving over twelve months)
$200k$400k$600k$800kYou own the systemTodayMonth 3Month 6Month 9Month 12$780,893 non-branded modelled, the mid case

The mid case arriving, on SheShedz's modelled non-branded revenue: roughly 10% of the new revenue live by month 3, 35% by month 6, 70% by month 9, all of it by month 12, ending at the $780,893 modelled run-rate. Because your sales cycle averages 70 days, revenue lands about a quarter behind the clicks that create it. On the live page, hover any point for the maths. Your branded, referral, walk-in and phone revenue sits on top the whole way. Modelled, directional

Trekk, the second model

Trekk gets its own smaller table, on its own measured value: GA4 records A$22,931 of organic revenue on 2,044 organic sessions in 90 days, A$11.21 a click, and that is a floor, because your phone orders and the Bunnings and Mitre 10 wholesale channel never touch the website's revenue tracking. The pool is Trekk's timber-shed lane; the garden-shed generics are counted in the SheShedz pool so nothing is double-counted.

CaseShare of the timber-shed poolNon-branded clicks / yrNon-branded revenue / yrNew revenue / yr
Today3.0%250$2,802
Conservative6.0%508$5,695+$2,892
Mid12.0%1,017$11,401+$8,598
High18.0%1,525$17,095+$14,293

The dollars are small because the site is nine weeks old in its current form; the striking-distance positions are the point. Every timber shed term already sits on page two, and page two to top three is the cheapest ranking move in search. The B2C order line is already running at 173% to 277% of its weekly goal in the last fortnight of your own scorecard. GA4 Weekly scorecard

Aura, deliberately not modelled. Aura's GA4 has zero key events configured: 6,885 sessions in 90 days and not one enquiry tracked against any of them. No measured conversion value exists, so any dollar figure we put on Aura's search opportunity would be invented. What we can say: your weekly scorecard shows site assessments running at 21 against a target of 40 over the last eight weeks, in the group's highest-ticket category. Tracking is the first fix, and it is days of work; the model extends to Aura the month the data exists.
How the clicks get won

Two levers, both measured. Click-through on the impressions you already earn: more than 60 SheShedz terms and 35 Trekk terms sit at positions 4 to 20 with real impressions, and moving them into the top three multiplies their clicks several times over. And new impressions in the lanes where you have product but no ranking: office pod (2,000 searches a month, not ranking), kit homes australia (3,000 a month, page five), granny flat prices (1,450 a month, page five). The conservative case assumes only the first lever lands; the high case assumes both do.

Every figure here is non-branded, closed-won revenue at the measured click value. HubSpot reports ex GST, so every dollar figure in this document is ex GST. AI-prompt demand is estimated separately in the appendix, so nothing here is double-counted. SheShed's total organic-search closed-won run rate, branded and long tail included, is A$1.71M a year on the same HubSpot basis, and the model's slice sits inside it.

5. The six-month transformation

A done-for-you AI and Search transformation over six months, run across the group with SheShedz as the engine. It moves through three phases: foundations (Aura and Trekk measurement fixed in week one, SheShedz page speed, Product schema on the pages that sell, and the AI-visibility baseline across all three brands), owning your territories (winning the top three across the 95-plus striking-distance terms, and building the roughly 94 pieces that own the core lanes, recalibrating SheShedz's live 297-post library rather than starting again), and authority and compounding (taking the category's authority crown while it is still cheap, on the Bunnings and Mitre 10 story, the regulatory content you already rank for, and the customer stories you already publish). We move into each phase as each site is ready for it rather than on a stopwatch. Everything is yours to keep.

The full breakdown, deliverables and your time commitment live in The offer tab.

Pipeline and closed-won figures are from your own HubSpot first-touch attribution (rolling 90 days to 28 August 2026, ex GST); traffic and rankings from each brand's own Google Analytics and Search Console (12 months to August 2026 for SheShedz and Aura; Trekk's account begins April 2026, so no year-on-year claims are made for it); order values from your own funnel sheet. Search volumes triangulated across Google Keyword Planner and SEMrush (AU), August 2026, with Ahrefs joining as the third source. Domain Ratings from Ahrefs, 28 August 2026. AEO scores from our AEO Maturity Model against live crawls of all three sites. Revenue figures are directional, modelled from your own measured click value, and are not a guarantee of results.

Appendix A: your channels and current position

Fort Group runs a genuinely measured sales operation: HubSpot first-touch attribution to closed-won revenue, a weekly scorecard across all three brands, and a 70-day sales cycle you can quote from memory. That discipline is rare, and it is what makes this model honest: every dollar figure traces to your own reporting.

SheShed deals created by first touchpoint, from your own HubSpot (rolling 90 days)
First touchpointPipeline createdDealsRead
Organic Google Search$1,252,13960Your single biggest source, and it runs without a media budget
Paid Google Ads$936,78647Strong, and rented; it stops when the budget stops
Organic other browser search$420,18020Bing and friends; organic search's second helping
Paid Facebook$395,08626Volume play
Organic Facebook$358,62317The brand's social pull
Walk in / showroom$274,31312Physical presence paying
Inbound phone$262,45710The 70-day cycle often closes here
Direct / unknown$252,60515Some of this is untagged search and AI traffic

Your HubSpot report totals $4,778,216 of pipeline across 239 deals in the rolling 90 days; the table shows the top sources. On closed-won over the same window the total is $1,073,800 across 53 closed-won contacts (HubSpot counts closed-won by contact), of which organic search (Google plus other browsers) is $421,178 across 19 deals, 39% of everything you closed. Annualised, organic search's closed-won run rate is about $1.71M. All ex GST. HubSpot

The ChatGPT line item. Your closed-won report carries Organic - AI Referral - ChatGPT at $12,600 from one deal. One deal is one deal, and the signal matters more than the size: your CRM is already attributing closed revenue to an AI assistant, before any AI-search work exists. The engines are already recommending backyard buildings to Australians; the only question is whose.
What GA4 can and cannot see
BrandSessions (90d)Organic shareAI-assistant sessionsThe catch
SheShedz147,89715.3%147A$1.2M of 90-day revenue sits Unassigned: the offline funnel coming back untagged. HubSpot, not GA4, is the money truth here.
Trekk22,4039.1%2045,856 key events on 22,403 sessions: conversion tracking counts nearly everything, so nothing. Needs rebuilding before its numbers mean anything.
Aura6,88512.3%12Zero key events configured. No enquiry has ever been measured on this site.

GA4, rolling 90 days per brand property. AI-assistant sessions are a source-level filter (chatgpt, gemini, claude, perplexity, copilot). Organic share is organic search sessions over all sessions. GA4

Appendix B: the scorecards in detail

Here is what sits behind each score, and what fixes each piece.

BrandFindingStatusFix
SheShedzStructured data: Organization, LocalBusiness, AggregateRating, Service, all server-rendered; llms.txt liveUnusually strongDone
SheShedzMobile page speedLighthouse lab: 48, main content at 40.7sWeeks
SheShedzProduct schema on product pagesMissing where it matters mostDays
SheShedzContent engine (297 posts, customer stories, regulatory FAQs)Strong base, misallocated: 2 pages against the 29,135/mo garden shed laneRecalibrate + fill gaps
SheShedzHubSpot attribution to closed revenue, including an AI-referral tagAhead of nearly every brand we auditWire it to the search side
TrekkLayout stability on mobileLighthouse lab: CLS 0.669, severe shiftingWeeks
TrekkProduct schemaPresentDone
TrekkGA4 key events45,856 events on 22,403 sessions, misconfiguredDays
TrekkBunnings + Mitre 10 stockist entity signalsInvisible to search and AIWeeks
AuraPage speedBest of the three: Lighthouse lab 68, zero layout shiftDone
AuraConversion trackingZero key events configuredDays
AuraContent beyond the 14-page brochureNone; no blog, no FAQ, no Product or Offer schemaBuild
All threeAI-visibility measurement (which engines cite which brand)None yetBaseline + monthly panel

The page-speed figures are Google's Lighthouse lab test simulating a mid-range phone on a slow connection; the sites may well feel fast on your own device, but the lab score is what Google measures each site against, and 40.7 seconds against a 2.5-second standard costs rankings every day. Lighthouse, 28 Aug 2026

The single highest-leverage fix is measurement, and it is nearly free. Aura needs conversion tracking that exists at all, Trekk needs conversion tracking that means something, and SheShedz needs its excellent HubSpot attribution joined to its search data. Days of work across the three, and every later decision, including how much to spend on each brand, gets made on numbers instead of feel.

Appendix C: the demand detail

From category demand to dollars
Measured coresearches / mo, AU, all three brands
66,120
Winnable poolorganic clicks / mo
~13,224
The group todayshare of the pool
26.2%

The 91-term core, triangulated and variant-folded so nothing is double-counted: "timber shed", "timber sheds" and "timber garden shed" are variants of one head term and contribute once. One term where Keyword Planner matched far outside the phrase (accommodation pods) and four whose dominant intent is not a backyard building (cabana, pool room, backyard storage, garden buildings) are excluded from the core entirely; the exclusions are listed in The data tab. Strip out ads, map packs and AI answers, and roughly one search in five survives as a winnable organic click. AI-prompt demand (an estimated 2,400 to 6,000 questions a month across the 82-prompt library) is counted separately so nothing is double-counted. Modelled

The AI questions, and who can own the answer

The library is built from questions with evidence behind them: your own Search Console queries, the FAQ and customer-story content SheShedz already publishes, the regulatory questions you already rank for, and the questions underneath the head terms. A sample:

Real questionBrandClusterEst. monthly demand
How much does a she shed cost in Australia?SheShedzShe shed2–4
What's the best backyard studio kit in Australia?SheShedzStudios & offices100–250
What size shed can I build without council approval?GroupRules & approvalsreal, you already rank on it
What is a class 10a structure and do I need approval?GroupRules & approvalsreal, observed on your own FAQ
Can I run a hair salon from a shed in my backyard?SheShedzBusiness in a shed6–16
Timber shed vs metal shed: which lasts longer?TrekkTimber shedsreal, comparative
What wooden shed kits can I buy at Bunnings?TrekkTimber shedsreal, ground truth
Best architecturally designed cabins in Australia?AuraArchitectural retreatsreal, comparative
Are SheShed cabins good quality? Reviews?SheShedzBrand & comparisonreal, brand

A sample of the 82-question library, all of it in The data tab with per-question demand, priority and ownability. Estimates are directional floors: 10 to 25% of the anchor term's measured volume, and questions with no keyword anchor are labelled as observed rather than given an invented number. 79 of the 82 are uniquely ownable by one of the three brands. Directional

Appendix D: where to play, your content territories

The same demand, grouped into the territories a plan executes against, with each territory owned by one brand so the three sites never compete with each other. The striking feature of the SheShedz library: 297 posts, deep on cabins and customer stories, nearly silent on the two biggest demand lanes it could own.

TerritoryBrandDemand / moCoverage todayPriority
Garden & potting shedsSheShedz + Trekk29,1352 SheShedz pages against the group's biggest laneP1
Backyard studios & garden officesSheShedz9,16574 pages, but office pod (2,000/mo) not rankingP1
Granny flats & tiny house kitsSheShedz8,59016 pages; the price and kit-home queries sit on page fiveP1
Cabins & cabin kitsSheShedz5,56091 pages, the strongest coverage on the siteP2
Timber & wooden shedsTrekk3,53068 pages, all on page two of the money termsP1
Pool houses & cabanasSheShedz3,02525 pages, position 6 to 7, top three within reachP2
She shedSheShedz3,000130 pages, and still position 8 on the head termP2
Business in a shedSheShedz1,40015 pages against a 99,000-impression nicheP2
Backyard workshopsTrekk1,160Nothing anywhere in the groupP3
Architectural retreats & off-gridAura910The 14-page brochure; no content at allP3
Rules & approvalsGroupTerritory evidence3 pages, already ranking on 10,198 impressions of habitable-room queriesStrategic
Buying journey & comparisonsGroupPrompt-led24 pages of FAQ and assembly content to recalibrateStrategic

Priority weighs demand, ownability and what already exists. Content requirement: roughly 94 pieces to own the core lanes across the group, and about 194 for full category coverage. A large share of the SheShedz work is recalibration of a live 297-post library, re-pointing existing posts at the queries they nearly win, rather than net-new writing. The full cluster maths is in The data tab. Cluster model

Lead with three. Garden sheds, the 29,135-a-month lane the group barely addresses, split deliberately between Trekk (timber) and SheShedz (premium rooms). Studios, offices and granny flats, where working-from-home and housing-cost demand meets product you already sell. Rules and approvals, the authority play: you already rank on the questions every buyer in every lane asks first, and the brand that owns the regulatory answers gets cited by the AI engines for everything else.

Appendix E: who you are up against, and the authority play

BrandDomain RatingRead
SheShedz19Joint category leader already
Aarons Outdoor19The established outdoor-living incumbent
Trekk Spaces15Largely inherited through the trekksheds redirect; thin behind it
Backyard Pods12The pod specialist
YZY Kit Homes12Kit-home competitor across the granny flat lane
Melwood6Cabana and pool house specialist
Aura Cabins3.6Effectively no link profile yet

Ahrefs Domain Rating, 28 August 2026. Competitor organic-traffic footprints join this table when the full Ahrefs pull lands this week. Ahrefs

Nobody owns this category's authority, which means it is for sale cheap. Roughly two-thirds of what AI engines cite comes from third-party sources, and in your category the strongest domain is a 19. The group holds assets none of the competitors can copy: a national retail footprint through Bunnings and Mitre 10, ten years of SheShed trading history and customer stories, the regulatory content buyers actually search for, and three brands that can reference each other. Spent deliberately, that is a category crown at a fraction of what it costs in markets where the incumbent is a 60.

Appendix F: where the numbers come from

SourceWhat it provides
Your own HubSpotFirst-touch attribution to pipeline and closed-won revenue, rolling 90 days, ex GST: the A$1,252,139 organic pipeline, the A$268,968 organic closed-won that anchors the click value, and the ChatGPT line. First touch on a 70-day cycle means the numbers credit the channel that started each deal.
Keyword volumes, triangulatedGoogle Keyword Planner and SEMrush (AU), taken as the median, variant-folded, with Keyword Planner's close-variant lumping detected and excluded. Ahrefs joins as the third source within the week; single tools miscount, so we never rely on one.
Each brand's own Search ConsoleSheShedz (domain property, history from April 2025), Aura (history from April 2025) and Trekk (history from April 2026, relaunched late June, so no year-on-year claims). We swept more than 28,000 query rows across the three accounts, classified every one against the planned lanes, and country-verified the out-of-plan candidates: habitable-room queries (10,198 impressions, 98% AU) and insulation packages (3,037 impressions, 100% AU) were kept as territory evidence rather than money-model terms, and nordic spruce was ruled out as 65% offshore. SheShedz's anonymised long-tail (about 42,700 clicks a year) is treated as non-branded and left outside the model, which makes the share figure conservative.
The she shed termsThe company is named after the category. Queries like "she shed" and "she shed australia" are counted as non-branded category demand, and only explicit brand spellings (sheshedz, sheshed) as branded. The split either way is shown in The data tab.
Each brand's own GA4Rolling 90 days per property: channel mix, organic sessions (the click-value cross-check), the AI-assistant source filter, and the measurement gaps reported in Appendix A exactly as found.
Your funnel sheetThe July funnel: 1,221 leads, 62.65% lead to SQL, 76 proposals worth $1,539,091, 12.73% close, $19,595 average order value. The AOV cross-checks HubSpot's average organic closed-won deal ($22,414) within 13%.
Head-term anchors + fan-outEvery AI prompt is anchored to the measured volume of the search term underneath it, with a conservative 10 to 25% band. Prompts with no anchor are labelled observed, not numbered.
Citation trackingA fixed panel of priority category questions per brand, run monthly across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, logging exactly which brands get named, with the baseline taken before any work ships.

Measurement runs in our own platform, so the dashboard, the data and the method are yours to keep, not rented from a third-party tool. The full research behind every table here is in The data tab. Method